DataMaster Michigan Invalid Sample
In 2001, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that an “invalid sample” result on the second test after a valid first test does not require suppression of the results of the first test.
The lack of a confirming test result does not alter the admissibility of the first result; instead, it “is relevant solely to the weight of the evidence.”Nor is a third test required in this situation. The court declared that the administrative rules did not mandate another sample and that “[t]he absence of a confirming test was relevant to the weight of the evidence, and not its admissibility.
If you took a DataMaster test in Michigan, and you have an invalid sample listed, we'll discuss how this will impact your case.
The lack of a confirming test result does not alter the admissibility of the first result; instead, it “is relevant solely to the weight of the evidence.”Nor is a third test required in this situation. The court declared that the administrative rules did not mandate another sample and that “[t]he absence of a confirming test was relevant to the weight of the evidence, and not its admissibility.
If you took a DataMaster test in Michigan, and you have an invalid sample listed, we'll discuss how this will impact your case.
