Former Michigan Prosecutor | Jonathan Andrew Paul
  • Crimes
    • Domestic Violence
    • Retail Fraud
    • Drug Offenses
    • Assaultive
    • College/Tailgate Offenses >
      • Minor in Possession
      • Ann Arbor MIP
      • Ann Arbor Fake ID
      • Ann Arbor UIP
      • Ann Arbor Open Container
    • Resisting Arrest
    • Handling a Traffic Ticket
    • Careless/Reckless Driving
    • Probation Violation
    • Early Discharge Probation
    • Larceny
    • Malicious Destruction of Property
    • Embezzlement
    • Juvenile Charges
  • Drunk Driving
    • Evidence >
      • Chemical Tests >
        • Implied Consent Law
        • Independent Chemical Test
        • Single Car Accident | DUI Defense
        • Effects of Body Temperature
        • Cross-Examining the DataMaster
        • Blood Testing 101
        • Impact of Methyl Alcohol/Paraldehyde
        • Radio Frequency Issues w/DataMaster
      • Right to Counsel
      • Preliminary Breath Test (PBT)
      • Field Sobriety Tests
      • Police Traffic Stop >
        • Sleeping in Car Defense
        • Cross-Examination - The Not Driving Defense
      • Police Statements
    • DUI Consequences >
      • Ignition Interlock
      • Restitution
      • Vehicle Immobilization
      • Travel Restrictions
      • Child Custody
      • Employment/Education
      • Traveling to Canada?
      • Vehicle Forfeiture
      • Civil Liability
      • Commercial Driver's License
    • DUI Trial Guide >
      • Jury Selection
      • Opening Statement
      • Cross-Examination
      • Closing Argument
      • Jury vs Bench Trial
    • Setting Bond >
      • Alcohol/Drug Testing Part #1
      • Alcohol/Drug Testing Part #2
      • Posting Bond
    • DUI Offenses >
      • Operating While Intoxicated
      • Operating While Visibly Impaired
      • Super Drunk/High BAC
      • Operating Presence of Controlled Substance
      • Child Endangerment
      • Felony Drunk Driving
      • DUI Under 21 Years Old
      • DUI Causing Injury/Death
    • Sobriety Court
    • DUI Pardons
  • Hiring a Super Lawyer
  • Courts
    • Wayne County >
      • More Courts >
        • Allen Park
        • Dearborn Heights
        • Detroit
        • Ecorse
        • Hamtramck
        • Harper Woods
        • Highland
        • Lincoln Park
        • Redford
        • Southgate
        • Taylor
        • Woodhaven
        • Wyandotte
      • Plymouth
      • Northville
      • Canton
      • Romulus
      • Livonia
      • Dearborn
      • Grosse Pointe
      • Westland
    • Oakland County >
      • Novi
      • Troy
      • Southfield
      • Royal Oak | Berkley
      • Rochester Hills
      • Farmington Hills
      • Bloomfield Hills
      • Waterford
      • Clarkston
      • Oak Park
      • Pontiac
      • Ferndale/Madison Heights/Hazel Park Drunk Driving DUI Criminal Attorney | Oakland County
    • Washtenaw County >
      • Ann Arbor
      • Chelsea
      • Pittsfield Township
      • Saline
      • Ypsilanti 14A
      • Ypsilanti 14B
    • Macomb County >
      • Center Line
      • Clinton Township
      • Eastpointe
      • Fraser
      • New Baltimore
      • Romeo
      • Roseville
      • Shelby Township
      • Sterling Heights
      • St. Clair Shores
      • Warren
    • Other Counties >
      • Livingston County
      • Monroe County
      • Jackson County
      • Lenawee County
      • East Lansing
  • Expungement
    • DUI Expungement
  • 5-Star DUI Defense
  • FAQ
  • Legal Guides
    • DUI Expungement
    • Arrested in Michigan? NOW WHAT!
    • Being Investigated?
    • 18 Key Questions for DUI's
    • Michigan License Restoration
  • Client Reviews
  • Growth Mindset
  • Inside the Prosecutor Mind
    • Drunk Driving >
      • OWI First Offense
      • OWI Second Offense
      • OWI Third Offense
      • Field Sobriety Tests
      • Chemical Tests
      • Implied Consent
      • Hardship License
      • Sobriety Court
    • Expungement
    • Assault/DV Charges >
      • Domestic Violence
      • Misdemeanor Assault
      • Felonious Assault
    • Theft Offenses >
      • Retail Fraud
      • Embezzlement
      • Larceny
    • College Offenses >
      • Open Container
      • Minor in Possession (MIP)
      • Urinating in Public
      • Fake ID
    • Drug Charges >
      • Felony Drug Possession
    • Driving - Traffic >
      • Reckless Careless Driving
      • Driving While License Suspended
      • Leaving Scene of Accident
    • Disorderly Conduct
    • Probation Violation
    • Resisting Arrest
    • Malicious Destruction of Property
    • Travel Requests
    • Bond Violations
  • Contact Me
  • Leading with Empathy

Michigan Field Sobriety Tests - Drunk Driving 

Call Me: 248-924-9458

Michigan Drunk Driving Boot Camp
Evidence: Field Sobriety Tests

Michigan field sobriety tests can be either extremely damaging to your case or slightly helpful.  In a perfect world, a defendant would not have submitted to any field sobriety test, because the police officer will always be able to find a few things that were done incorrectly, which are inferred means the defendant was intoxicated.  There is no scientific evidence that these tests indicate someone is intoxicated or under the influence; many sober people cannot perform these same tests.

Performing a test too fast, slow or minor variance from the instructions is considered a failure of the test.  These tests were designed to provide evidence of intoxication, not assist in a defendant's drunk driving defense.  The prosecution will present a "totality of the circumstances" argument that any mistake performing these tests equate to intoxication.  It's important for your attorney to focus on the favorable test results, and discredit what the prosecution would have you believe indicates intoxication.   Here are a few of the most common field sobriety tests:

Alphabet reciting test

The arresting officer will tell the defendant to recite the alphabet, sometimes starting and ending at different letters.  If the defendant asks for clarification during the test, pauses or hesitates, the officer may mark the defendant as failing this test.  The arresting officer should be cross-examined and admit alternative explanations for the defendant's supposed "failure" on the test.  The officer and prosecution would have you believe a "failure" on this test equates to intoxication; this is not always true, and the arresting officer will leave open the possibility that performance was due to nerves, being unfamiliar with the process, and a host of other explanations.  If the officer fails to acknowledge alternative explanations, your attorney can argue to the jury that the officer was so adamant about your guilt and building the case against you, that they would not even acknowledge other reasonable explanations.

Touching your nose with your finger test

The arresting officer will ask the defendant to extend their arms and close their eyes; the defendant is then instructed to touch the tip of their nose.   This technique has no scientific basis for testing for intoxication.  There are a handful of alternative explanations for not performing well on this test; your attorney will explore these possibilities, and the officer should admit that the alternative explanations are plausible.   If the officer will not acknowledge these alternative explanations, your attorney will be able to argue to the jury that the officer was so adamant about your guilt and building the case against you, that they would not even acknowledge other reasonable explanations.

Walk and turn test

This test requires a defendant to walk heel to toe and turn.  The officer is required to find a clean surface with a visible line; the surface must be level.  It is VERY easy to fail this test; most sober people cannot 100 percent comply with its requirements.  If you lose balance, start early, end early, fail to touch heel to toe on each step, usage arms for balance, stepping off the visible line or performing incorrect number of steps, you fail this test.  This is not a reliable test for intoxication, and your attorney will explore the results of this test on cross-examination.

One-legged stand

The arresting officer will instruct the defendant to stand with a leg raised about six inches off the ground for about 30 seconds.  If the defendant sways, hops or uses his/her arms for balance, it's a failure.  This is a ridiculous test for most people, and almost impossible for person with physical conditions or defendants of certain age groups.  Your attorney will explore the results of this test, and go after the assumption that the results of this test are any bit reliable.

Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus

This is a test that looks for involuntary jerking of the eye, which is alleged to be caused by the presence of alcohol in the defendant's system.  This test is highly subjective, which the officers have very little training.  An officer is expected to conduct an eye examination on the side of the road, and determine whether the subject has consumed alcohol based upon jerking of an eye.  You don't need to be a doctor to know that jerking of an eye can be caused by various reasons other than alcohol consumption.
Picture
Picture
michigan field sobriety tests, walk and turn, one legged stand, alphabet count, touch nose, dui, HGN, probable cause

    Insider Information from a  Former Michigan Prosecutor
    Please fill out the confidential form below or call me.

Submit
What Other Attorneys Say About Me:
"I had the opportunity of observing Jonathan represent a co-defendant in a difficult 3 count felony drug case. Through Jonathan's efforts all 3 felony counts were dismissed and client pled to a simple misdemeanor possession charge; a truly fantastic result for the client. I would without hesitation recommend Jonathan on a criminal matter"

"When I first met John, he was beating me up as a prosecutor. When I heard John became a defense attorney, I was elated for two reasons, first that I wouldn't have to go against him any more, and two, that anybody charged with a crime an Ann Arbor and Washtenaw County have an exceptional criminal defense attorney who gets the job done. As a defense attorney, John uses his extensive experience to craft solutions to tough cases. As a fellow defense lawyer, I rely on John's advice in my own cases. If you are in Ann Arbor and are in trouble, call John, he will help you"

"Jonathan is an extremely bright and talented criminal defense lawyer. His years of experience as a prosecuting attorney in New York and Michigan has already made him a top practitioner in his field. I happily endorse Jonathan Paul".
Representing clients in Ann Arbor, Canton, Brighton, Howell, Saline, Adrian, Taylor, Plymouth, Northville, Westland, Ypsilanti, Pittsfield Township, Warren, Sterling Heights, Farmington, Pontiac, Romulus, Lansing, Novi, South Lyon, Southfield, Birmingham, Bloomfield Hills, Royal Oak, Troy, Rochester, Jackson, East Lansing, Garden City, Livonia, Dearborn, Detroit, St Clair Shores, Hazel Park, Ferndale, Madison Heights, Waterford, Milford, Shelby Township Clarkston, Oak Park, Berkley, Fraser, Sterling Heights, Clinton Township and others throughout Washtenaw, Wayne, Monroe, Jackson, Saginaw, Macomb, Ingham, Lenawee, Charlevoix, Ottawa, Clinton, Eaton, Kent, Crawford, Allegan, Emmet, Barry, Kalkaska, Berrien, St. Clair, Livingston, Oakland County & Northern Michigan 

Representing clients faced with DUI/drunk driving, retail fraud/shoplifting, drug charges, MDOP, domestic violence, reckless driving, disorderly conduct, careless driving, leaving the scene of an accident, fake ID, open container, UIP, early termination probation  and other misdemeanor and felony charges. 

Evening & Weekend Service Available Call Me: 248-924-9458

Picture

Ann Arbor Office Location

Plymouth Office Location

Michigan Defense Attorney Jonathan Paul - Former New York & Michigan Prosecutor