If you’ve been charged with Operating While Intoxicated (OWI), Impaired Driving, Super Drunk, Operating With the Presence of Drugs (OWPD), Minor BAC Zero Tolerance, or Child Endangerment in Plymouth, Canton, Northville, or another area within the jurisdiction of the 35th District Court, your case will be heard by Judge Joe Barone or one of the other judges at this court.

A DUI charge is a serious matter that can impact your freedom, driver’s license, career, and personal reputation. If Judge Barone is assigned to your case, it’s essential to understand the legal process, potential consequences, and defense strategies that could make a difference in your outcome.

​Common DUI Charges Heard by Judge Barone at the 35th District CourtIn Michigan, drunk driving offenses are categorized based on BAC levels, prior offenses, and whether minors or drugs were involved. If you are appearing before Judge Barone for a DUI-related charge, you may be facing one of the following:
​
1. Impaired Driving (OWVI – Operating While Visibly Impaired)

• Definition: Driving while alcohol or drugs visibly impair your ability to operate a vehicle safely.
• Penalties:
  • Up to 93 days in jail
  • Fines up to $300
  • 90-day restricted driver’s license
  • 4 points on your driving record

2. Operating While Intoxicated (OWI – BAC of 0.08% or Higher)

• Definition: Driving with a BAC of 0.08% or higher or showing substantial impairment due to alcohol or drugs.
• Penalties:
  • Up to 93 days in jail
  • Fines up to $500
  • License suspension for 30 days + 150 days restricted driving
  • 6 points on your record
  • Possible ignition interlock device

3. Super Drunk (High BAC – BAC of 0.17% or Higher)

• Definition: Enhanced DUI charge for individuals with a BAC of 0.17% or higher.
• Penalties:
  • Up to 180 days in jail
  • Fines up to $700
  • License suspension for 45 days + 320 days restricted driving with an ignition interlock
  • 6 points on driving record

4. OWI 2nd Offense (Within 7 Years of First OWI)

• Definition: A second DUI within 7 years of a prior conviction.
• Penalties:
  • Up to 1 year in jail
  • Fines up to $1,000
  • License revocation for 1 year
  • Mandatory vehicle immobilization
  • Possible probation with alcohol treatment

5. OWI 3rd Offense (Felony DUI – Lifetime Lookback in Michigan)

• Definition: A third drunk driving offense in your lifetime results in felony charges.
• Penalties:
  • Up to 5 years in prison
  • Fines up to $5,000
  • License revocation for a minimum of 5 years
  • Mandatory probation, alcohol treatment, or rehabilitation programs

6. Operating With the Presence of Drugs (OWPD)

• Definition: Driving with any amount of a controlled substance in your system.
• Penalties: Similar to OWI charges, but often require drug testing and treatment programs as part of probation.

7. Minor BAC Zero Tolerance (Underage Drinking and Driving)

• Definition: Drivers under 21 with a BAC of 0.02% or higher.
• Penalties:
  • Fines up to $250
  • Community service requirements
  • Possible suspension of driver’s license

8. Child Endangerment DUI

• Definition: DUI while having a child under 16 years old in the vehicle.
• Penalties:
  • Up to 1 year in jail
  • Fines up to $1,000
  • License suspension and points on driving record

​If you’ve been charged with retail fraud in Fenton, Michigan, you’re not alone. Retail fraud, often referred to as shoplifting, is one of the most common offenses among first-time offenders in Genesee County. For many, this charge comes as a complete shock, leading to feelings of embarrassment, anxiety, and uncertainty about what comes next. However, a single mistake doesn’t have to define your future. In this article, we’ll explore the basics of Michigan’s retail fraud laws, what to expect if your case goes before Judge McCabe, and how an experienced attorney can help you move forward without a criminal record.

Understanding Michigan’s Retail Fraud Laws

Retail fraud in Michigan is a broad term covering several actions, including:

• Taking merchandise from a store without paying.
• Altering price tags or labels to pay less.
• Attempting to return stolen items for cash or store credit.

For the prosecution to secure a conviction, they must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:

• You took or moved items for sale.
• You intended to steal the merchandise permanently.
• The incident took place inside or immediately outside the store while it was open.

The Three Degrees of Retail Fraud in Michigan

Michigan categorizes retail fraud into three degrees based on the value of the stolen items:

• Third Degree: Items valued under $200. This is a misdemeanor punishable by up to 93 days in jail and fines.
• Second Degree: Items valued between $200 and $1,000. This is a one-year misdemeanor.
• First Degree: Items valued over $1,000. This is a felony, carrying the risk of significant fines and prison time.

Understanding the charge you’re facing is the first step toward building a strong defense.

Judge McCabe’s Courtroom in Fenton: Key Things to Know

If your case is being heard by Judge McCabe at the 67th District Court in Fenton, it’s important to understand his approach. Known for a fair yet firm stance on retail fraud cases, Judge McCabe considers both the nature of the offense and the character of the defendant.

Here’s what could impact the outcome of your case:

1. Your Criminal History: As a first-time offender, you might be eligible for alternatives to jail time, such as probation or diversion programs.
2. Restitution and Remorse: Expressing genuine remorse and willingness to pay restitution can make a positive impression.
3. Legal Representation: A knowledgeable attorney can help present your case effectively, highlighting your clean record and the circumstances that led to the incident.

Why Good People Make Bad Decisions: The Psychology of Retail Fraud
Retail fraud is rarely about greed or criminal intent, especially for first-time offenders. In many cases, it’s a momentary lapse in judgment fueled by stress, financial pressure, or emotional distress.

Key Psychological Factors:

• Impulse Control Issues: Stress and anxiety can impair decision-making, leading to impulsive actions.
• Financial Strain: For some, shoplifting feels like the only way to cope with financial hardship.
• Opportunity and Risk Perception: Large stores with limited security can create a sense of low risk, making the decision seem less severe.

By understanding the underlying reasons for your actions, you and your attorney can build a defense that addresses these factors with empathy and clarity.

Common Myths About Retail Fraud Charges

Myth 1: You Must Leave the Store to Be Charged with Shoplifting
Fact: In Michigan, simply moving merchandise with the intent to steal can lead to charges, even if you haven’t left the store.

Myth 2: Retail Fraud Is a Minor Offense
Fact: While often viewed as petty, a retail fraud conviction can carry severe penalties, including jail time, fines, and a permanent criminal record.

Myth 3: Paying for the Item Later Will Dismiss Charges
Fact: Offering to pay for stolen merchandise after being caught does not negate the offense or prevent charges.

Defense Strategies for Retail Fraud in Fenton
A strong defense is essential for minimizing the impact of a retail fraud charge. Here are some strategies your attorney might consider:

1. Lack of Intent: Proving that you did not intend to permanently take the items can be a powerful defense.
2. Diversion Programs: First-time offenders might qualify for programs that result in charges being dismissed upon successful completion.
3. Plea Bargains: In some cases, negotiating a lesser charge or alternative sentencing can help you avoid a criminal record.

Diversion Programs and HYTA Eligibility

For first-time offenders, diversion programs offer a path to keep retail fraud charges off your record. Under Michigan’s Holmes Youthful Trainee Act (HYTA), offenders under 26 may also avoid a criminal record upon completing probation successfully.

How an Attorney Can Help You Move Forward
Having an attorney who understands Michigan’s retail fraud laws and has experience in Judge McCabe’s courtroom can make a significant difference. Here’s how:

1. Personalized Defense Strategy: Tailoring a defense based on your situation, background, and the specifics of the charge.
2. Courtroom Representation: Presenting your case effectively to Judge McCabe, emphasizing your clean record and willingness to make amends.
3. Empathy and Support: Providing guidance and emotional support throughout a stressful process.

Turning a Mistake into an Opportunity for Growth

While a retail fraud charge is serious, it can also serve as a wake-up call—a chance to reflect, learn, and make better decisions in the future. By understanding the factors that led to this mistake and working proactively to address them, you can turn this challenge into an opportunity for growth.
​
If you’re facing retail fraud charges in Fenton, contacting an experienced attorney should be your first step. A professional who understands the local court system and has a track record of helping first-time offenders can guide you toward the best possible outcome.

A New Era for the 16th District Court: Honoring Judge James J. JollyThe 16th District Court in Livonia welcomes Judge James J. Jolly, who was elected to the bench in November 2024. Judge Jolly brings a wealth of legal and public service experience to his new role, having spent over 15 years serving the Livonia community in various capacities.

His background includes:
✅ Attorney Representation (2008-2024): Focused on municipal matters, small business law, and personal legal issues.
✅ Assistant City Attorney for Westland (2022-2024): Provided legal guidance on city matters.
✅ Livonia City Council Member (2016-2024): Advocated for Livonia’s growth and development.
✅ 16th District Court Magistrate (2008-2015): Oversaw legal proceedings before joining the bench.
✅ Community Leadership: Led Livonia’s Neighborhood Grant Program, secured funding for Bicentennial Park’s all-ability playground, and promoted a bike-friendly city.

With his deep roots in the community, Judge Jolly’s tenure is expected to bring fair, balanced, and community-driven justice to the 16th District Court.

As he begins his judicial service, DUI cases will be among the most common matters appearing before him. Below, we explore what this means for Livonia residents facing drunk driving charges.


DUI Charges in Livonia: What You Need to Know

The 16th District Court handles Operating While Intoxicated (OWI) and other drunk driving cases occurring in Livonia. If you have been arrested for DUI, your case will be overseen by Judge James Jolly or Chief Judge Sean P. Kavanagh.


The Psychology of DUI: Why Do Good People Get Arrested?

Many DUI cases involve law-abiding, responsible individuals who never expected to be in the criminal justice system. Understanding why people make this mistake can help defendants demonstrate accountability and achieve a better outcome in court.

Criminological Theories Applied to DUI Cases

✅ Rational Choice Theory (Cornish & Clarke)

• People assess risks vs. rewards before making decisions.
• Many DUI offenders underestimate risk and overestimate their ability to drive.
• Example: A person thinks, "It’s only a few miles home, I’ll be fine."

✅ Behavioral Economics (Kahneman & Tversky)

• Alcohol impairs judgment, making people overconfident in their ability to drive.
• Example: A driver believes they "drive better after a few drinks", ignoring the reality of impairment.

✅ Neutralization Theory (Sykes & Matza)

• People justify their behavior to reduce guilt.
• Example: “I wasn’t as drunk as some people,” or “I just needed to get home.”

✅ General Strain Theory (Agnew)

• Stress and emotional strain can lead to impulsive decisions.
• Example: A person drinks after a stressful workday and drives home, believing they are making a logical choice.

These psychological factors do not excuse DUI, but they help judges and prosecutors understand the behavior. Our approach at Empathy Defense is to frame your case as a learning opportunity, demonstrating personal growth and accountability.


Final Thoughts: Judge Jolly’s Impact on DUI Cases in Livonia

Judge James J. Jolly brings extensive legal experience and community engagement to the 16th District Court. His background in municipal law and city governance suggests a balanced, fair approach to justice—one that considers both accountability and rehabilitation.

For individuals facing DUI charges in Livonia, his leadership provides an opportunity to take control of their situation, demonstrate growth, and achieve the best possible outcome.
​
If you have a DUI case before Judge Jolly or Judge Kavanagh, reach out today to discuss your defense strategy and take proactive steps to move forward.

The 19th District Court, located in Dearborn, Michigan, serves a community with a diverse population and a rich cultural heritage. Presided over by the Honorable Judges Sam Salamey, Mark W. Somers, and Gene Hunt, this court frequently handles cases involving Operating While Intoxicated (OWI) and Driving Under the Influence (DUI) offenses.

It's perplexing when individuals, often regarded as upstanding citizens, find themselves facing charges for OWI or DUI. Criminological theories offer insights into the factors that may lead good people to make such poor choices.

Social Learning Theory: Behavior is Learned

Albert Bandura's Social Learning Theory suggests that behavior is acquired through observation and imitation. In Michigan, social norms surrounding alcohol consumption can inadvertently promote risky behaviors.

• Cultural Norms: Social gatherings, sporting events, and celebrations often involve alcohol, potentially normalizing excessive drinking.
• Peer Influence: Individuals may emulate peers who downplay the risks of impaired driving, perceiving it as acceptable.

Rational Choice Theory: The Cost-Benefit Analysis

This theory posits that individuals make decisions based on a cost-benefit analysis. However, alcohol impairs judgment, leading to flawed assessments.

• Perceived Control: Some believe they can safely drive after drinking, underestimating impairment.
• Minimizing Risk: The convenience of driving oneself may overshadow the perceived risks, especially for short distances.

Strain Theory: Coping with Stress

Robert Merton's Strain Theory highlights how societal pressures can lead to deviant behavior as a coping mechanism.

• Alcohol as Escape: Individuals may use alcohol to alleviate stress, subsequently making impaired decisions like driving under the influence.

Situational Factors: The Role of Opportunity

Environmental factors can influence decision-making.

• Access to a Vehicle: Easy access to a car increases the likelihood of choosing to drive after drinking.
• Immediacy of Decision: Alcohol-induced impulsivity can lead to spontaneous decisions to drive, bypassing rational thought.

Preventing Poor Choices: Solutions Rooted in Understanding

Recognizing these factors can inform interventions to prevent OWI and DUI offenses:

1. Education Campaigns: Raise awareness about the risks and legal consequences of impaired driving.
2. Peer Support Programs: Encourage responsible behaviors and the use of alternative transportation.
3. Community Resources: Enhance access to public transportation and rideshare services, especially during peak social hours.
4. Stress Management Resources: Provide support for individuals to manage stress without resorting to alcohol.

Conclusion: Compassion and Accountability
​
Understanding the underlying factors that lead individuals to commit OWI or DUI offenses is crucial. By addressing these issues through education, community support, and accessible resources, we can work towards reducing the incidence of impaired driving in Michigan.

If you or someone you know is facing an OWI or DUI charge in the 19th District Court, it's important to seek legal counsel and support to navigate the legal process and make informed decisions moving forward.

The 48th District Court, located in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, serves several communities, including Birmingham, Bloomfield Hills, Keego Harbor, Orchard Lake Village, Sylvan Lake, and the charter townships of Bloomfield and West Bloomfield.
Patch

Presided over by the Honorable Judges Diane D'Agostini, Marc Barron, and Kimberly Small, this court frequently handles cases involving Operating While Intoxicated (OWI) and Driving Under the Influence (DUI) offenses.
Oakland County

It's perplexing when individuals, often regarded as upstanding citizens, find themselves facing charges for OWI or DUI.

​Criminological theories offer insights into the factors that may lead good people to make such poor choices.

Social Learning Theory: Behavior is Learned

Albert Bandura's Social Learning Theory suggests that behavior is acquired through observation and imitation.
In Michigan, social norms surrounding alcohol consumption can inadvertently promote risky behaviors.

• Cultural Norms: Social gatherings, sporting events, and celebrations often involve alcohol, potentially normalizing excessive drinking.
• Peer Influence: Individuals may emulate peers who downplay the risks of impaired driving, perceiving it as acceptable.

Rational Choice Theory: The Cost-Benefit Analysis

This theory posits that individuals make decisions based on a cost-benefit analysis.
However, alcohol impairs judgment, leading to flawed assessments.

• Perceived Control: Some believe they can safely drive after drinking, underestimating impairment.
• Minimizing Risk: The convenience of driving oneself may overshadow the perceived risks, especially for short distances.

Strain Theory: Coping with Stress

Robert Merton's Strain Theory highlights how societal pressures can lead to deviant behavior as a coping mechanism.

• Alcohol as Escape: Individuals may use alcohol to alleviate stress, subsequently making impaired decisions like driving under the influence.

Situational Factors: The Role of Opportunity
Environmental factors can influence decision-making.

• Access to a Vehicle: Easy access to a car increases the likelihood of choosing to drive after drinking.
• Immediacy of Decision: Alcohol-induced impulsivity can lead to spontaneous decisions to drive, bypassing rational thought.

Preventing Poor Choices: Solutions Rooted in Understanding
Recognizing these factors can inform interventions to prevent OWI and DUI offenses:

1. Education Campaigns: Raise awareness about the risks and legal consequences of impaired driving.
2. Peer Support Programs: Encourage responsible behaviors and the use of alternative transportation.
3. Community Resources: Enhance access to public transportation and rideshare services, especially during peak social hours.
4. Stress Management Resources: Provide support for individuals to manage stress without resorting to alcohol.

Conclusion: Compassion and Accountability
Understanding the underlying factors that lead individuals to commit OWI or DUI offenses is crucial.
By addressing these issues through education, community support, and accessible resources, we can work towards reducing the incidence of impaired driving in Michigan.

If you or someone you know is facing an OWI or DUI charge in the 48th District Court, it's important to seek legal counsel and support to navigate the legal process and make informed decisions moving forward.