Former Michigan Prosecutor | Jonathan Andrew Paul
  • Crimes
    • College/Tailgate Offenses >
      • Minor in Possession
      • Ann Arbor Urinating in Public
      • Ann Arbor Open Intoxicant
      • Ann Arbor Possession Fake ID
    • Retail Fraud >
      • Proactive Criminal Defense - Michigan Retail Fraud
    • Domestic Violence >
      • Proactive Criminal Defense - Michigan Domestic Violence
    • Drug Offenses >
      • Proactive Criminal Defense - Michigan Possession of Marijuana
    • Assaultive
    • Resisting Arrest
    • Handling a Traffic Ticket
    • Careless/Reckless Driving
    • Larceny
    • Malicious Destruction of Property
    • Embezzlement
  • Drunk Driving
    • Evidence >
      • Chemical Tests >
        • Implied Consent Law
        • Independent Chemical Test
        • Single Car Accident Cases
        • Effects of Body Temperature
        • Cross-Examining the DataMaster
        • Blood Testing 101
        • Impact of Methyl Alcohol/Paraldehyde
        • Radio Frequency Issues w/DataMaster
      • Right to Counsel
      • Preliminary Breath Test (PBT)
      • Field Sobriety Tests
      • Police Traffic Stop >
        • Sleeping in Car Defense
        • Cross-Examination - The Not Driving Defense
      • Police Statements
    • DUI Consequences >
      • Ignition Interlock
      • Restitution
      • Vehicle Immobilization
      • Travel Restrictions
      • Child Custody
      • Employment/Education
      • Traveling to Canada?
      • Vehicle Forfeiture
      • Civil Liability
      • Commercial Driver's License
    • DUI Trial Guide >
      • Jury Selection
      • Opening Statement
      • Cross-Examination
      • Closing Argument
      • Jury vs Bench Trial
    • Setting Bond >
      • Alcohol/Drug Testing Part #1
      • Alcohol/Drug Testing Part #2
      • Posting Bond
    • DUI Offenses >
      • Operating While Intoxicated
      • Operating While Visibly Impaired
      • Super Drunk/High BAC
      • Operating Presence of Controlled Substance
      • Felony Drunk Driving
      • DUI Under 21 Years Old
      • DUI Causing Injury/Death
    • Sobriety Court
    • DUI Pardons
  • Courts
    • Oakland County >
      • Novi >
        • Proactive Criminal Defense at the 52-1 District Court
      • Troy
      • Southfield
      • Royal Oak/Berkley
      • Rochester Hills
      • Farmington Hills
      • Bloomfield Hills/Birmingham
      • Waterford
      • Clarkston
      • Oak Park
      • Pontiac
      • Ferndale/Hazel Park/Madison Heights
    • Wayne County >
      • More Courts >
        • Allen Park
        • Dearborn Heights
        • Detroit
        • Ecorse
        • Hamtramck
        • Harper Woods
        • Highland
        • Lincoln Park
        • Redford
        • Southgate
        • Taylor
        • Woodhaven
        • Wyandotte
      • Plymouth >
        • Proactive Criminal Defense at the 35th District Court
      • Northville
      • Canton
      • Romulus
      • Livonia
      • Dearborn
      • Grosse Pointe
      • Westland
    • Macomb County >
      • Center Line
      • Clinton Township
      • Eastpointe
      • Fraser
      • New Baltimore
      • Romeo
      • Roseville
      • Shelby Township
      • Sterling Heights
      • St. Clair Shores
      • Warren
    • Washtenaw County >
      • Proactive Washtenaw County Criminal Defense >
        • Winning in Washtenaw County
        • Domestic Violence - Survival Guide
        • Tailgate Offenses - Survival Guide
        • Drunk Driving - Survival Guide
        • Drug Case - Survival Guide
        • Retail Fraud - Survival Guide
      • Ann Arbor >
        • Proactive Ann Arbor Criminal Defense at the 15th District Court
      • Chelsea
      • Pittsfield Township
      • Saline
      • Ypsilanti 14-A
      • Ypsilanti 14-B
    • Jackson County
    • Lenawee County
    • Livingston County
    • Monroe County
    • East Lansing
  • Hiring a Super Lawyer
  • Expungement
  • 5-Star DUI Defense
  • Attorney Bio
  • Legal Guides
    • Attorney Videos >
      • Ann Arbor >
        • Other Videos >
          • Arraignment to Trial at 15th District Court
          • Ann Arbor Investigation 101
          • Hiring an Ann Arbor Attorney
          • Ann Arbor Judges & Prosecutors
          • Trial or Plead Guilty?
          • Ann Arbor Probation Violation
        • Ann Arbor Retail Fraud
        • Univ of Michigan Students
        • Ann Arbor Assault
        • Ann Arbor Domestic Violence
        • Ann Arbor Minor in Possession
        • Ann Arbor Drunk Driving - 1st Offense
        • Ann Arbor Super Drunk DUI
        • Ann Arbor Possession Marijuana
        • Ann Arbor Open Container
        • Ann Arbor UIP
      • Retail Fraud >
        • More Videos >
          • Wayne County Retail Fraud
          • Macomb County Retail Fraud
          • Jackson County Retail Fraud
          • Livingston County
          • Southfield Retail Fraud
          • Madison Heights Retail Fraud
          • 48th District Court
          • Clinton Township Retail Fraud
        • Troy Retail Fraud
        • Ann Arbor Retail Fraud
        • Canton-Plymouth Retail Fraud
        • Livonia Retail Fraud
        • Novi Retail Fraud
        • Rochester Hills Retail Fraud
        • Sterling Heights Retail Fraud
        • Westland Retail Fraud
        • Farmington Hills Retail Fraud
        • Pittsfield Township Retail Fraud
      • Washtenaw County >
        • Drunk Driving Offenses >
          • Washtenaw DUI 2nd & 3rd Offense
          • Pittsfield Township DUI
          • Ypsilanti Drunk Driving
          • Saline Drunk Driving
          • Chelsea Drunk Driving
          • Operating Presence Drugs
        • Pittsfield Township 14A-1
        • Ann Arbor 15th Court
        • Ypsilanti 14A-2 Court
        • Saline 14-4 District Court
        • Chelsea 14A-3 Court
        • Minor in Possession
        • DV Charges Washtenaw
        • Police Investigations
        • Washtenaw Possession of Marijuana
      • Plymouth - Canton - Northville 35th District Court >
        • Drunk Driving
        • Retail Fraud
        • Domestic Violence
        • Minor in Possession
        • Probation Violations
        • Marijuana Possession
        • Bond Conditions and Testing
        • Felony Charges
        • Arraignment to Trial
        • Judges and Prosecutors
      • Novi - South Lyon - Milford - Commerce - Wixom 52-1 >
        • Retail Fraud
        • Drunk Driving
        • Marijuana Possession
        • Minor in Possession
        • Domestic Violence
        • Probation Violations
        • Bond Conditions/Testing
        • Arraignment to Trial
        • Felony Charges
      • Possession of Marijuana >
        • Wayne County
        • Oakland County
        • Washtenaw County
        • Macomb County
        • Livingston County
        • Livonia
        • Ann Arbor
      • Livonia >
        • Livonia Retail Fraud
        • Livonia Misdemeanor Charges
        • Livonia Drunk Driving
        • Livonia Possession of Marijuana
      • Domestic Violence >
        • Washtenaw County
        • Oakland County
        • Wayne County
        • Macomb County
        • City of Ann Arbor
      • Expungement
    • FAQ
    • Arrested in Michigan? NOW WHAT!
    • Being Investigated?
    • Free Consumer Guide - Michigan Retail Fraud
    • 18 Key Questions for DUI's
    • Michigan License Restoration
  • Inside The Prosecutor Mind
  • Proactive Criminal Defense
  • Contact Me
  • Client Reviews
  • Blog

Plymouth Drunk Driving | Operating While Intoxicated - 35th District Court DUI Attorney

12/4/2013

 

DUI Attorney Plymouth Michigan

If the prosecution is able to prove that you were Operating a Motor Vehicle on a Highway Open to the Public, the final element that requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt is whether you breaking the law under three different theories - either "under the influence", operating with a blood alcohol content above 0.08 or a blood alcohol content above 0.17.

The first theory Operating While Intoxicated "under the influence" is defined by the Criminal Jury Instructions as

"Because of drinking alcohol, the defendant's ability to operate a motor vehicle in a normal manner was substantially lessened" -

"To be under the influence a person does not have to be what is called dead drunk, that is falling down or hardly able to stand up.  On the other hand, just because a person has drank alcohol or smells of alcohol does not prove, by itself, that the person is under the influence of alcohol.  The test is whether, because of drinking alcohol, the defendant's mental or physical condition was significantly affected and the defendant was no longer able to operate a vehicle in a normal manner"

The key to "under the influence" is you must be under the influence while driving your car.  If the police make observations, administer field sobriety and chemical tests at a time after you were driving, then this evidence is less relevant the further away you get from driving the car.  If there is evidence you were driving at 10 pm, but the police aren't involved until 11:30 then 90 minutes have gone by since the operation, and anything from 11:30 may not be relevant to your condition 90 minutes earlier.  The reason this evidence may not be relevant, is because alcohol does not immediately peak after consuming; alcohol can take up to 60-90 minutes to peak in your system.

If you consume a large quantity of alcohol then immediately jump into a car, your blood alcohol level is going to be a lot lower than it would be 60-90 minutes later.  There is also the possibility that the driver drove then consumed the alcohol after driving; any observations or test results would then not be relevant to the condition, which the defendant drove the car, because the drinking occurred after the driving.

If observations and tests are performed immediately after operation then there are still various ways to challenge "under the influence". Each Michigan drunk driving case is fact specific with strengths and weaknesses; your attorney will highlight factors that tend to show that you were not under the influence while driving, and your mental or physical condition was not significantly affected in operating a vehicle in a normal manner.  Some factors may include the lack of bad driving, cooperation with the police, performing well on field sobriety tests.  Remember, it is always the prosecutions burden to prove this element, but they will only highlight the negative factors to gain a conviction; your attorney must even out the playing field and tell the complete story.

The second theory Operating While Intoxicated - Unlawful Bodily Alcohol Level - .08 at the time of operation

This theory is based entirely on the chemical test results, which can be breath test, blood or urine sample, and is independent of the first theory of "under the influence".  The prosecution will seek to admit the chemical test results to prove this element; it may be possible to challenge their admissibility and their accuracy if and when they are admitted.

There are two ways to defeat the "per se" charge:

The first way is to not challenge the actual test result, but challenge it's relevance to when the defendant was actually driving.  If the defendant is driving at 10 pm, but the test is administered at 11 pm, then the result isn't actually what the driver would have registered at 10 pm.    The test cannot prove what the defendant's blood alcohol was at 10 pm, but only at 11 pm.  This could be very helpful if the blood result is in the 0.09 -0.11 range an hour later, because the blood alcohol could be rising, and was below 0.08 an hour earlier.

The second way is to challenge the accuracy of the breath, urine or blood test.  This tests can be challenged on the basis that procedures, safeguards, chain of custody and may other factors were not followed, and results are not accurate.  An expert could testify, and re-create the defendant's consumption, and based upon all factors including the amount of alcohol, weight of the defendant and time considerations, what the defendant's blood alcohol was at the time of operation.  If this result is different than the state's evidence, it might create reasonable doubt for an acquittal.

Although both theories can be challenged, the jury only needs to find that either you were "under the influence" or had a blood alcohol level above .08.

Comments are closed.

    Call Me Today
    248-924-9458
    ​
    Email Me

    top criminal lawyer michigan, metro detroit, northville, plymouth attorney
    Picture

    Click to Email Me

    Lawyer Jonathan Paul | Top Attorney Criminal Defense
    Lawyer Jonathan Paul | Lawyer Criminal Defense
    Picture

    Search the Blog

    Blog Posts

    - The Michigan Retrograde Extrapolation Guide

    - Selecting an Ann Arbor Criminal Defense Lawyer

    - Selecting an Oakland County Criminal Defense Lawyer

    - Drunk Driving Consults

    - The One Question Your Michigan Criminal Defense Lawyer Should not be Able to Answer

    - Are the police allowed to follow me home from a bar?

    - Is it illegal to smoke weed and drive a car in Michigan? What's the legal limit for pot?

    - Michigan Police Confessions 101

    - Michigan 7411 Drug Crimes

    - FAQ: Shoplifting in Michigan

    - Michigan HYTA Eligibility

    - Can I be on probation while    away at college?

    - What is a Deferred Judgment of Guilt?

    - Michigan CDL Alcohol Penalties 

    - Ann Arbor Arrested for Fake ID, Urinating in Public, Minor in Possession, Open Container

    - Should I Admit to Drinking Alcohol?

    - Arrested for Minor in Possession in Ann Arbor?

    - Michigan DUI Probation Violation Hearings

    - How To: Claiming Self Defense at Trial 

    - Michigan Sex Offender FAQ

    - Should I use the Public Defender?

    - Washtenaw County Felony OWI Options

    - Handling a Michigan traffic ticket

    - How to beat a Careless Driving Charge

    - Hiring a Wayne County Criminal Defense Lawyer

    - Michigan DUI Concealed Weapon Permit

    - What's a Michigan Preliminary Examination?

    Neighbor Disputes

    - Can I Remove my GPS Tether?

    - Vehicle forfeitures 
     - Will I lose my license for a drug charge?

    - Michigan Driver's Responsibility Fees

    - Falsely Accused on Domestic Violence
    - 48th District Court Prosecutors 
    - Am I eligible for expungement with two convictions?
Representing clients in Ann Arbor, Canton, Brighton, Howell, Saline, Adrian, Taylor, Plymouth, Northville, Westland, Ypsilanti, Pittsfield Towsnhip, Warren, Sterling Heights, Farmington, Pontiac, Romulus, Lansing, Novi, South Lyon, Southfield, Birmingham, Bloomfield Hills, Royal Oak, Troy, Rochester, Jackson, East Lansing, Garden City, Livonia, Dearborn, Detroit, St Clair Shores, Hazel Park, Ferndale, Madison Heights, Waterford, Milford, Shelby Township Clarkston, Oak Park, Berkley, Fraser, Sterling Heights, Clinton Township and others throughout Washtenaw, Wayne, Monroe, Jackson,  Macomb, Ingham, Lenawee, Livingston and Oakland County. 

Representing clients faced with DUI/drunk driving, retail fraud, possession of marijuana, domestic violence, MIP/minor in possession and other misdemeanor and some felony charges. 
Ann Arbor Address
P.O. Box 7052 
Ann Arbor, MI 48107 
Picture
Kelly & Kelly, P.C. 
422 East Main Street 
Northville, Mi 48167 

Proud Sponsor of the Following
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Evening & Weekend Service Available Call Me: 248-924-9458

Michigan Defense Attorney Jonathan Paul | Former New York & Michigan Prosecutor

Lawyer Jonathan Paul | Lawyer Criminal Defense
Jonathan Paul
Picture
Picture
✕